A couple came to see me a while back. He was 65, she was 61.
He’d always planned to retire at 65. But when it came down to it, they didn’t feel ready. There was still a mortgage. There was uncertainty.
They’d both had advice before, through their super funds. Separate advice, for separate accounts. It wasn’t wrong, exactly, but it wasn’t connected either. They described it as “scattergun”. They’d followed it, but never quite trusted that it truly felt like the right thing for them. How was it helping them build towards something…..and was that something, what they wanted?
We started somewhere different:
– not “what’s the best return?”
but
– “what actually matters to you?”
The answers were simple. Clear the mortgage. Stay in their home as long as possible. Spend more time in the garden. Take one big overseas trip to the places that meant something to their family.
So we modelled three paths: retire now, work another three years, or work another five years, and looked honestly at what each option would mean.
Five years gave them the strongest financial footing, no question. But five more years of work also has a cost that doesn’t show up in a spreadsheet. Their health was a real part of that conversation, not a footnote.
Three years got them almost everything they wanted. The mortgage gone. More time for the things they enjoyed. The trip, perhaps scaled back slightly, but still theirs.
More importantly, it felt like a balance they could live with. Enough extra time to improve their position significantly, without postponing the next chapter of life longer than they wanted to.
In the end, that’s what they chose.
What I’ve learned doing this work is that the value isn’t really in the strategy. Super consolidation, contribution timing, drawdown order… that’s the mechanics.
The real value is in understanding the trade-offs before you’ve committed to anything.
– What if we worked a little longer, but fewer hours?
– What if we trimmed spending here?
– What does that actually do to the timeline?
None of those questions have a “correct” answer. They have an answer that’s right for the two people in the room.
That’s the challenge with advice delivered one piece at a time. Not because any one piece is necessarily wrong, but because it’s difficult to see the whole picture when each decision is considered in isolation.
Some of the biggest financial decisions aren’t really about money. They’re about time, health, family, purpose, and what you’re willing to trade to get the future you want.
If you’re facing a decision where the numbers matter, but they aren’t the whole story, please get in touch! I’d love to chat about how I can help.
Our very own Samantha Albiez speaks with Jim Stackpool, the Founder of Certainty Advice Group, about the challenges today's financial advisory firms face.
As we continue to grow with the support of our clients, it's exciting to be able to give another young superstar a start in our industry.
Bravium client Aaron Breban talks about why he and his partner decided to seek financial advice in their mid-20s.